Tanning salons are establishments that provide services that enable people to acquire a tan while indoors. Generally, they have a number of beds where people lie for a specific time to progressively tan the skin. Normally, for an individual to accomplish the longed for tan, they must attend sessions for a number of weeks or a number of months and to continue keeping the tanned skin, they must attend regular tanning sessions.
The danger of UVA Light Rays
When tanning salons initially became popular, they were believed to be a safer option to outdoor tanning due to less prolonged exposure to UVA and UVB irradiation. More established salons specifically used UVB rays and this exposed clients to considerable jeopardy and the possibility of skin damage. Presently, most tanning salons use UVA light rays and while this poses a lesser risk of harm, there is still the possibility of skin damage.
The FDA Requirement for Cancer Warning Signs
The FDA wants tanning salons to post cancer warning signs and has been debating the matter for some time now. The idea behind tougher warnings is based on the fact that there is a growing general scientific agreement that there are no safe tans. Tougher regulations are also as a result of concerns about the apparatus that is used not working correctly and thus exposing customers to too much radiation.
Regulatory Control Measures by the FDA
At present, indoor tanning beds are categorized as low risk medical equipment and are not subject to any audit or inspection by the FDA. However, renewed safety concerns have led to suggestions by the FDA to place the industry at the middle risk group of classification. This would necessitate that companies that deal with cosmetics and specifically in the area of tanning would demonstrate that their equipment has incorporated the latest developments and safety issues are not a concern anymore.
Cosmetics Companies Not Committed To Correct Safety Measures
This would also ensure that their sunlamps release correct amount of energy and that all preventative safety determinants are put in place. The FDA argues that while most indoor tanning companies ought to be carrying out testing, they are currently not doing so. The FDA also believes that those that are actually doing it are going about it the wrong way or are not undertaking sufficient smart testing measures.
Research Backs Up Complacency Claims
Research has also highlighted the fact that the tanning industry has in most cases overlooked safety protocol as well as regulations. This is particularly because the advocated tanning exposure periods have been surpassed by 95% of indoor tanners as a report by the American Journal of Preventive Medicine has indicated. When cosmetics companies do not post consumer warnings and admit consumers under the age of 18 to tan without permission from parents, this puts people under great risk.
The Importance of Warnings and the Young at Age
The FDA’s argument is further reinforced by the fact that many people risk getting melanoma, one of the most prevalent forms of skin cancer. Studies indicate that the risk of melanoma increases by 75% for people that use tanning beds at an early age. While tanning beds have some warnings that link them to cancer, the markers are not easily detectable to consumers and do not specifically disclose their risks to young customers.
What the FDA Envisions For Consumers
Stringent measures are required as well as firmer warnings, more regulation, and a reclassifying of the tanner beds. While the FDA acknowledges that people will still use the beds, they would like to see these beds be made as low risk as possible. The FDA also wants consumers to be given access relevant information about critical hazards. Basically, the FDA objectifies a situation where consumers know what dangers they expose themselves to so that they can make informed decisions.